As discussed in “Garbage In => Garbage Out”, the data series used for back-testing is critical to good system design. In particular, I want to use the data series for an attempt at regime characterization.

When I read Stridsman‘s “Trading Systems the Work” I was struck by his discussion in Chapter 3 of various methods of back-adjusting data series for analysis. I was sold on the idea of Ratio Adjusted Data as contrasted with Panama Adjusted Data.

Ratio adjusted data has 2 key advantages:

  • You never end up with negative valued contracts.
  • Percentage relationships are preserved in the data series.

CSI Unfair Advantage offers a ratio-adjustment option for creating price-series, and they credit Stridsman for the idea. I am currently down-loading the free CSI data from the TradingBlox website. This data has already been back-adjusted using the Panama method. I wrote an R script to process each file and create ratio-adjusted series.

If you want to back-test a system I see no way of doing it without using what I refer to as Rad-Contracts. If you use Panama-adjusted contracts (Pan-Contracts) your position sizes will be wrong, your draw-downs will be wrong, your portfolio composition will be wrong, etc, etc.

To convince yourself of the wisdom of using Rad-Contracts consider oil’s drop from it’s Pan-High of $178 to it’s low of $56: down 68%. The Pan-High for oil was $266 followed by a low of $50 for a declne of 81%. The Rad-Contract is more reflective of the economic cost of holding oil futures during that period than is the Pan-Contract.

Aside: Compare this to the decline in the OIL etf from $119 to $23 (-81%) – despite the criticism that these etf’s “do not track the ‘price’ of oil” they do track the true economic cost of holding commodities.

Another aside: I assumed that this stuff was taken as read in the system trading field, but at least a couple of firms I have spoken to say they DO NOT use Rad-Contracts in their back-testing!

I would be very interested in arguments against using Rad-Contracts.

This post is part of a longer series:

  1. Garbage In => Garbage Out
  2. This post
  3. Data Validation
  4. Generalized Extreme Value Distribution
  5. Some additional protocols.

New Commodity Pool Launches

Please provide your name and email address so we can send you our quarterly compilation of new commodity pools registered with NFA.

We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe.

Thank you. Your file will be available after you confirm your subscription. Check your in-box!

Biggest Hedge Funds By $AUM

Please provide your name and email address so we can send you our quarterly compilation of biggest hedge funds by $AUM as reported on the SEC's Form ADV.

We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe.

Thank you. Your file will be available after you confirm your subscription. Check your in-box!

Free Hedge Fund ODD Toolkit

Note this is US Letter size. If you want A4, use the other button!

We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe.

Thank you. Your file will be available after you confirm your subscription. Check your in-box!

Free Hedge Fund ODD Toolkit

Note this is A4 size. If you want US Letter, use the other button!

We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe.

Thank you. Your file will be available after you confirm your subscription. Check your in-box!

Subscribe:

Don't miss our next hedge fund article!

We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe.

Thank you! Check your email for confirmation message.

Share This

Share

If you found this post informative, please share it!